Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Life Cycle Assessment of second generation bioethanol produced from low-input dedicated crops of Arundo donax L.

TitoloLife Cycle Assessment of second generation bioethanol produced from low-input dedicated crops of Arundo donax L.
Tipo di pubblicazioneArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Anno di Pubblicazione2016
AutoriZucaro, Amalia, Forte A., Basosi R., Fagnano M., and Fierro A.
RivistaBioresource Technology
Volume219
Paginazione589-599
ISSN09608524
Parole chiaveAgricultural, alcohol, article, Arundo donax, Arundo donax L, automobile, Automobiles, Bioethanol, biofuel, biofuels, biological production, car, cellulose, comparative study, Conventional gasoline, Crashworthiness, Crop, Crops, Cultivation, energy crop, environment, Environmental impact, environmental impact assessment, environmental management, Environmental performance, Ethanol, Feedstock production, Feedstocks, fossil, gasoline, Gasoline production, Global warming, grass, greenhouse effect, life cycle, life cycle analysis, life cycle assessment, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Lignocellulose, metabolism, ozone depletion, Ozone layer, Photochemical oxidants, photochemical smog, Poaceae, priority journal, Second generation, Second generation bioethanol, species cultivation, Transportation
Abstract

This work presents a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of bioethanol (EtOH) from perennial Arundo donax L. feedstock. A “cradle-to-wheel” approach was applied considering primary data for the cultivation of dedicated crops on hilly marginal lands and innovative “second generation technologies” for feedstock conversion into EtOH. The goals of the study were to: (i) quantify impacts of lignocellulosic EtOH production/use chain, (ii) identify hotspots and (iii) compare the environmental performance of different bioethanol-gasoline vehicles, E10 (10% EtOH and 90% gasoline) and E85 (85% EtOH and 15% gasoline), with a conventional gasoline passenger car. Results for E85 underlined that the feedstock production and the use phase were the prevailing contributors, whilst for E10 the gasoline production phase shared the largest part of impacts. The comparison showed that vehicles using lignocellulosic bioethanol have potentially significant benefits on global warming, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidant formation and fossil depletion in respect to conventional passenger car. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd

Note

cited By 16

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982135211&doi=10.1016%2fj.biortech.2016.08.022&partnerID=40&md5=61da1b8a70eebc186efe0901c56888a3
DOI10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.022
Citation KeyZucaro2016589