Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Assessing the potential for niche market development to contribute to farmers' livelihoods and agrobiodiversity conservation: Insights from the finger millet case study in Nepal

TitoloAssessing the potential for niche market development to contribute to farmers' livelihoods and agrobiodiversity conservation: Insights from the finger millet case study in Nepal
Tipo di pubblicazioneArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Anno di Pubblicazione2016
AutoriPallante, G., Drucker A.G., and Sthapit S.
RivistaEcological Economics
Volume130
Paginazione92-105
ISSN09218009
Parole chiaveagricultural ecosystem, Biodiversity, conservation management, consumption behavior, discrete choice analysis, Eleusine coracana, farmers attitude, Food security, income, market development, millet, Nepal, niche partitioning, profitability, smallholder, Sustainability, urban area, willingness to pay
Abstract

This paper explores the potential for niche market development of neglected and underutilized species as an intervention for improving both smallholder livelihoods and the agrobiodiversity conservation. We consider the case of finger millet, which plays an important role in the food security of Nepalese poor and marginalized farmers. Despite such importance, production and consumption are decreasing as a result of, inter alia, the expanding availability of more profitable crops, a lack of awareness regarding its nutritional qualities by urban consumers and limited R&D dedicated to this crop. Nevertheless, the potential to improve the ability of farmers to capture the values related to the positive environmental and nutritional externalities associated with the production and consumption of local landraces, suggests that the conservation through use of such genetic resources can support the achievement of development goals. We analyse both the demand and supply side of a potential niche market for local finger millets. Using a choice experiment we find that urban consumers have a willingness to pay a premium price sufficient to compensate producers' conservation opportunity costs. We also identify a range of challenges for such an intervention to be considered effective from both an economic and ecological perspective. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.

Note

cited By 4

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978267559&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecolecon.2016.06.017&partnerID=40&md5=bd76aa098610091d9661fe32eec839f1
DOI10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.017
Citation KeyPallante201692