Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Is cryopreservation a homogeneous process? Ultrastructure and motility of untreated, prefreezing, and postthawed spermatozoa of Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti)

TitoloIs cryopreservation a homogeneous process? Ultrastructure and motility of untreated, prefreezing, and postthawed spermatozoa of Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti)
Tipo di pubblicazioneArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Anno di Pubblicazione2001
AutoriTaddei, A.R., Barbato F., Abelli L., Canese Stefano, Moretti F., Rana K.J., Fausto A.M., and Mazzini M.
RivistaCryobiology
Volume42
Paginazione244 - 255
Data di pubblicazione2001///
Parole chiaveCryopreservation, Diplodus puntazzo, Electron microscopy, Fish, Spermatozoa, Ultrastructural anomalies
Abstract

This study subdivides the cryopreservation procedure for Diplodus puntazzo spermatozoa into three key phases, fresh, prefreezing (samples equilibrated in cryosolutions), and postthawed stages, and examines the ultrastructural anomalies and motility profiles of spermatozoa in each stage, with different cryodiluents. Two simple cryosolutions were evaluated: 0.17 M sodium chloride containing a final concentration of 15% dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) (cryosolution A) and 0.1 M sodium citrate containing a final concentration of 10% Me2SO (cryosolution B). Ultrastructural anomalies of the plasmatic and nuclear membranes of the sperm head were common and the severity of the cryoinjury differed significantly between the pre- and the postfreezing phases and between the two cryosolutions. In spermatozoa diluted with cryosolution A, during the prefreezing phase, the plasmalemma of 61% of the cells was absent or damaged compared with 24% in the fresh sample (P < 0.001). In spermatozoa diluted with cryosolution B, there was a pronounced increase in the number of cells lacking the head plasmatic membrane from the prefreezing to the postthawed stages (from 32 to 52%, P < 0.01). In both cryosolutions, damages to nuclear membrane were significantly higher after freezing (cryosolution A: 8 to 23%. P < 0.01; cryosolution B: 5 to 38%, P < 0.001). With cryosolution A, the after-activation motility profile confirmed a consistent drop from fresh at the prefreezing stage, whereas freezing and thawing did not affect the motility much further and 50% of the cells were immotile by 60-90 s after activation. With cryosolution B, only the postthawing stage showed a sharp drop of motility profile. This study suggests that the different phases of the cryoprocess should be investigated to better understand the process of sperm damage. © 2001 Elsevier Science.

Note

Cited By (since 1996): 16Export Date: 23 August 2010Source: Scopus

URLhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035666732&partnerID=40&md5=82f8670fffaa05460b0229a48ff158c7
Citation Key62