Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Department for Sustainability

  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Efficiency and aging comparison between N,N′-bis (3-methylphenyl)-N, N′-diphenylbenzidine (TPD) and N,N′-Di-[(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′- diphenyl]-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine (NPD) based OLED devices

Efficiency and aging comparison between N,N′-bis (3-methylphenyl)-N, N′-diphenylbenzidine (TPD) and N,N′-Di-[(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′- diphenyl]-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine (NPD) based OLED devices

TitleEfficiency and aging comparison between N,N′-bis (3-methylphenyl)-N, N′-diphenylbenzidine (TPD) and N,N′-Di-[(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′- diphenyl]-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine (NPD) based OLED devices
Publication TypeArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Year of Publication2007
AuthorsMaglione, Maria Grazia, Minarini Carla, Miscioscia Riccardo, Nenna G., Romanelli E., and Tassini Paolo
JournalMacromolecular Symposia
Volume247
Pagination311-317
KeywordsAging decays, Aging of materials, Electrooptical effects, energy efficiency, Film thickness, Hole Transporting Material (HTM), Luminance, Organic light emitting diodes (OLED), Polymer matrix, Power efficiency
Notes

cited By 0
URLhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547233515&partnerID=40&md5=f76ae30856b2d9477fb861339c712c62
DOI10.1002/masy.200750135
Citation KeyMaglione2007311