Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Different erionite species bind iron into the structure: A potential explanation for fibrous erionite toxicity

TitleDifferent erionite species bind iron into the structure: A potential explanation for fibrous erionite toxicity
Publication TypeArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsPacella, A., Cremisini C., Nardi E., Montereali Maria Rita, Pettiti I., Giordani M., Mattioli M., and Ballirano P.
JournalMinerals
Volume8
ISSN2075163X
Abstract

In this investigation, the crystal chemical characterization of one sample of woolly erionite-K (Lander County, NV, USA) was examined after suspension in a FeCl2 solution, in anaerobic conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the chemical composition of erionite on its efficiency to bind iron. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) results showed that the sample bound Fe(II) through an ion-exchange mechanism mainly involving Ca. In addition, chemical and structural data indicated that Fe(II) is fixed at the Ca3 site, six-fold coordinated to water molecules. According to Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) sample surface area the amount of Fe(II) bound by the fibers was comparable with that retrieved for fibrous erionite-Na sample from Rome (OR, USA) for which the ion-exchange process mainly affected Na. This finding provides clear evidence of a strong tendency of Fe(II) to bind to the erionite structure. Furthermore, considering that the woolly erionite-K from Langer County differs markedly from erionite-Na from Rome in the extra-framework cation content, our observations indicate that the Fe binding efficiency is not significantly modulated by the chemical composition. Notably, Fe ion-exchanged and/or accumulated on the fiber surface can generate hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction, thus influencing the potential carcinogenicity of the different erionite species. © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Notes

cited By 13

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041115799&doi=10.3390%2fmin8020036&partnerID=40&md5=e3c0fc512eab6c2f2713c9d79d58bdbf
DOI10.3390/min8020036
Citation KeyPacella2018